Build San Tin Technopole on Solid Ground and Create a Wetland Park that Reduces Floods in nw Hong Kong and Shenzhen

One of the best arguments for protecting the San Tin fish ponds area – rather than destroying a large area to build the San Tin Technopole – should be mitigating flooding risk, including in downtown Shenzhen, which is also on the Shenzhen River floodplain.

Yes, the Shenzhen River and more have been turned into giant drainage type channels (Shenzhen River Regulation Project); but that is not an adequate, sustainable solution, as events in September 2023 show: for instance:

All schools, some subway stations and offices in the Guangdong city of Shenzhen were shut on Friday.

Residents holding onto safety lines stepped gingerly through knee-deep water in Shenzhen, videos from state media showed.

[[Note that Shenzhen floods affect downtown areas like Luohu, which is on the Shenzhen River floodplain]]

Hong Kong, Shenzhen deluged by heaviest rain on record

Floodplain restoration is proving effective elsewhere; see a study here (more links below; searching online reveals a whole lot more information):

We conclude that projects that both reduce flood risk and restore ecosystems are clearly possible and often cost-effective, and that they could be more widely implemented. The principal barriers are often institutional and regulatory, rather than technical.

Restoring Rivers and Floodplains for Habitat and Flood Risk Reduction: Experiences in Multi-Benefit Floodplain Management From California and Germany

Fanciful idea for a wetland park with multiple benefits including reducing flooding risk

Suppose instead of development, a wetland was established – partly by demolishing bunds, interlinking ponds and even creating large ponds or lakes – and this had a total area of 500ha, with the ability to reduce water level by at least a metre at low tide, via sluice gate[s] to Shenzhen River, in turn emptying into Deep Bay and thence the Pearl River Delta. This would have a capacity of at least 5 million cubic metres [as floodwaters could be channelled pumped in to raise the level by metre or more]; far bigger than the CEDD’s planned underground water storage facility with a capacity of 200,000 cubic metres. 

Yes, the wetland park name is over the top; but to indicate multi-functionality, and hence maybe boost its appeal – wetlands’ ecosystem services are far more than simply protecting rare birds and otters etc

Map of the wetland park/floodplain restoration area here; as you can see extremely detailed… … 

Yes, this idea is fanciful; yet I’m not sure why I haven’t seen more about this from green groups and others.

LOTS more results if google for river flooding floodplain restoration; it’s not a new, untested idea. There’s even a lake along Shenzhen River supposed to have this function; evidently too puny.

And yes, such a wetland park in HK would not be enough for the biggest floods, and would be overwhelmed by storm surge. But could help at times.

Instead, building on floodplain seems just cavalier…

Experts: Wetlands key to climate-resilient Northern Metropolis

There’s no need to just take my word for ways the Deep Bay wetlands are vital for even urban development in northwest Hong Kong and Shenzhen. See, for instance, this opinion piece by three leading Hong Kong ecologists [which I found after drafting these notes; not sure if I’d read it months ago too]:

According to the Northern Metropolis development strategy, the government plans to establish a comprehensive wetlands protection system of some 2,000 hectares. These wetlands have the highly beneficial effect of increasing the climate resilience of Hong Kong, but this function has been largely ignored. These wetlands function as natural buffers that absorb rainwater and are adapted to being flooded. During the black rainstorm [early September 2023], they stored tremendous amounts of rainwater and protected adjacent buildings and roads from flooding. They then quickly returned to normal once the rains subsided and excess water drained away.

It is worrying that the government has missed the opportunity to use nature-based solutions in advancing Hong Kong and the Northern Metropolis to become an international demonstration of a Wetland City, where nature and development coexist in harmony.

Wetlands are key to securing a climate-resilient Northern Metropolis

Worldwide, restoring floodplains delivers great benefits

You can see plenty more regarding alleviating floods through restoring floodplains, for instance:

Restoring Mississippi River Basin Health with Floodplains

River restoration contributes to flood risk management by supporting the natural capacity of rivers to retain water. As flood risk consists of damage times occurence,  flood risk management needs to reduce either the damage, or the likelihood of floods to occur, or both. River restoration reduces the likelihood of high water levels, and improves the natural functions of the river at same time.

How does river restoration reduce floodrisk

The rehabilitation and restoration of floodplains and river wetlands provides seasonal aquatic habitats, creates corridors of native riparian forests and creates shaded riverine and terrestrial habitats. Furthermore, it helps to retain and slowly release discharge from water bodies as well as to facilitates groundwater recharge and improves water quality… Moreover, river wetlands can help maintaining the functioning of estuarine and delta ecosystems and creating natural land features that act as storm buffers, thus protecting people and property from flood damages, also related to sea level rise and storm surges.

Rehabilitation and restoration of rivers and floodplains

restoring rivers’ natural characteristics and dynamics increase flood resilience in a more sustainable way and more cost-effectively than traditional engineering solutions. 

With Germany, Belgium and Turkey still reeling from historic floods, a new report outlines how Nature-based Solutions can help reduce the impact of such disasters across Europe.

Deep Bay including Mai Po articles

One comment

  1. An article in Wen Wei Po advocates developing the technopole on higher ground, avoiding the San Tin fish ponds.
    A translation of a paragraph to English:
    //From the perspective of land use and administration, compared with the original plan, Dr. Zhang’s plan can use resources more effectively in terms of cost, operational resilience, environmental disputes and collective transportation.//
    Article here: https://www.wenweipo.com/a/202411/15/AP67365a9ae4b07d24342472b2.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *